The Kanu terrorism conviction took a critical turn on Thursday as the Federal High Court in Abuja found IPOB leader Nnamdi Kanu guilty of engaging in acts of terrorism. The judgment, delivered by Justice James Omotosho, marks a major development in the long-running case prosecuted by the Department of State Services (DSS).
Judge Rules Kanu’s Broadcasts Encouraged Violence
Delivering the ruling, Justice Omotosho held that Kanu’s repeated threats of violence, killings and enforced sit-at-home orders across the South-East amount to acts of terrorism.
According to the judge, these directives—frequently issued during his broadcasts—contributed to widespread fear, disruption and attacks within the region, forming the basis of the Kanu terrorism conviction.
Conviction on Three Out of Seven Charges
The court found Kanu guilty on counts one, two and three of the seven-count charge brought before it. These charges relate specifically to:
- Encouraging violent acts
- Issuing threats that led to loss of lives
- Directing civil disruptions through sit-at-home orders
The remaining charges are expected to be addressed as the full judgment continues to unfold.
Judgment Still Ongoing
Justice Omotosho is still reading the full judgment, and further details are expected to emerge regarding sentencing and the remaining charges.
More updates on the Kanu terrorism conviction will be provided as the court concludes its decision.
The Kanu terrorism conviction represents a landmark moment in Nigeria’s counterterrorism legal proceedings. With the court confirming guilt on major charges, the nation now awaits the final components of Justice Omotosho’s judgment.
